I imagine Alice Walker and Paul Bloom, if they were to sit
down and have dinner with one another, would find something to share in common
in regards to one's Self. Paul Bloom acknowledges the existence of a multitude
of personalities within each person. While Alice Walker in her essay highlights
the fragility of our temperament. Alice remembers vividly being the confident,
dauntless child she was. She flourished in social situations, giving formal
speeches without hesitation and promptly declaring herself "the
prettiest" to her father in an assertion that was reason enough to choose
her over her siblings (and he did). Then preceding retelling of an accident
that left her eye blinded and visibly scarred she points out the twist of fate
abruptly stating, "It was great fun being cute. But then, one day, it
ended." This is followed by a dramatic withdraw socially and academically
for her. She recollects this time negatively. At age 14 she has the mass left
in her eye removed and minimizes the appearance of the damage. Although, as
drastically as her personality seemed to 180 at the occurrence of the injury,
she claims that, "Almost immediately I become a different person from the
girl who does not raise her head." Paul Bloom would consider this an
illustration of his point, "The idea is that instead, within each brain,
different selves are continually popping in and out of existence." Paul
Bloom believes our personalities can be conditional and dominate depending on
circumstance. Alice Walker’s essay gives a seamless account of how delicate our
dispositions may be and how rapidly they can polarize.
Although I agree for the most part with your analysis of each individual author I believe your assertion that they would be in ontological agreement is false. In Alice Walkers world the self is one cohesive structure going under certain changes that completely change its form whereas there isn't necessarily a self with Paul Bloom. His structure of the human condition is far more elastic and not one solid organism but rather a pool of conditions that can dominate other conditions given certain stimuli. The difference is small yet I would not go so far to say that they would support each others statements.
ReplyDeleteThat's a great evaluation of the aim of each author. I noticed upon further discussions of the readings I kind of missed the mark with Alice Walker's essay.It makes more sense that Alice's personality takes on long term whole changes rather than a provisional battle between some competing desires as Paul Bloom gives example of. Thanks for that input! It's very effectively articulated.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete